The captains' thoughts on all things branding, design, viral, video, and web. Join the conversation!

By Lindsey Campbell, Captains of Industry

Hey Captains’ readers,

For your Monday Deal, I’ve decided to address another fellow blogger, Elaine Fogel. Her excellent blog post on MarketingProfs captivated me so much that I’ve decided to use my Deal to answer her questions at the end of her post. In case you didn’t get a chance to read the lovely Elaine’s low down, here’s a quick summary. Basically, Fogel fears for journalism’s life. She’s afraid that everything that made journalism a great and reliable method of collecting important news and dispersing it to the masses is slowly dying at the hand of citizen journalism. Things like fact checking, truth, integrity, and even taste are all but lost. As a blogger and marketer myself, I hate seeing one of my fellow comrades in distress, so here’s my best attempt to put Fogel’s mind at ease.

Lindsey’s Reasons Why Journalism Won’t Go To Hell in a Hand Basket:

1. Citizen journalism isn’t Satan on a stick

In fact, it can be quite good. By giving everyone a voice, we’re essentially telling big media conglomerates that they can suck it—but maybe in a much nicer way. Rather than relying on a handful of journalists who are constantly being pressured to raise their ratings or provide a certain point of view in order to report the news, we can take matters into our own hands and report, comment and control the news. This not only provides us with a wider range of topics, opinions and facts to explore, but it gives the voice of the news back to the people. Instead of relying solely on a few hundred people to act as our watchdogs, citizen journalism is giving people the opportunity to watch out for themselves. I don’t know about you, but I think the less control people have over what I know, the better.

2. Don’t get it twisted

The beauty of having so MANY citizen journalists ruling the roost is that if someone gets a piece of news wrong, others can correct it. This way, the Stephen Glasses of the world don’t even have a sliver of a shot of pulling the proverbial wool over our eyes ever again. It’s sort of like Wikipedia for the news. Take a look at any news blog and you’ll see that people aren’t just voicing their opinions, but they’re providing relatable links for other readers to learn from.

3. People love to hate Lindsay Lohan

We just need to accept it. Like it or not, there’s a large majority of the population that like to know what celebrities are doing. But, that doesn’t necessarily mean that they don’t also want to learn about the stock market, the war, or the national debt. People have been keeping their eye on celebs since the Hollywood sign was erected up in those famous California hills. People once obsessed over Marilyn Monroe. May West. Ginger Rogers. It’s a trend I’m afraid won’t ever go away, but we shouldn’t assume that the country is dumbing itself down because they like to be entertained by celebrity scandals. Some of the brightest people on the planet can’t resist them a little Lohan.

So, Fogel, to answer your biggest question, I don’t think journalism is dead. I think it’s just different. And while we work out the kinks (poor Shirley Sherrod), we should recognize the positive aspects of giving the people a voice. You have to admit, citizen journalism has its positives points. Take your blog post for instance. Without it, I wouldn’t have heard your opinion, your voice, or your point of view, leaving me to never consider why I think citizen journalism works or why it doesn’t. Believe it or not, people listen.

I did.

Until tomorrow,

Captain Lindsey

2 Responses to “Lindsey’s Daily Deal: Hey, Elaine Fogel. This one’s for you.”

  1. Elaine Fogel

    I appreciate your response in this blog post, Lindsey! I think we are talking about two different things. I would never consider my blog posts “news.” They are definitely opinion pieces – ones I’m glad people read and voice their comments. That’s what blogging is all about.

    Perhaps there’s a difference in semantics here. Perhaps the more common use of the term, “citizen journalists” applies to those of us who publish content online. I think it’s a wonderful means of expression and dialog with others. But, is it “news?”

    Journalists are trained to fact check and investigate to get to the “truth” of an issue, not just to publish their impressions or opinions. Sure, the profession has been diluted in recent years for many reasons, some of which you mention – media conglomerates, ratings, etc. However, in essence, all news outlets of the past relied on advertising revenue. That’s how we got sensational headlines and teasers to entice us to purchase the paper or stay glued to our TVs.

    When I read a quality newspaper or watch a well-presented broadcast news show, I know that there have been many people behind the scenes working on those articles and stories. “Citizen journalists” don’t have the means to do that on their own. And too many of them have an agenda and skip the impartiality. That’s where my concern lies.

    I applaud those of us who publish online, share our thoughts and experience, and learn from each other. I am suggesting that we consider changing the term “citizen journalists” to something else – a descriptor that does not include the word, “journalism.”

    Thanks for reading my post and writing your opinion here.

  2. Lindsey

    Hey Elaine,

    It’s great to hear from you! Thanks for reading my post. I guess my point was that we have to embrace that journalism is changing. Mostly because of technology. I’m even noticing that journalists ask citizens for their personal footage to use in their news reports. Since everyone is so connected nowadays, journalists are actually seeking the aid of citizens–which I find really interesting. Also, to your point, I see that there’s an adjustment that’s happening in that some people are relying more on blogs for their news. Maybe journalists can find a better way to provide news to their viewers on blogs, in a place where they search for their news already? This might, at least, provide people with news that still uses the same standards that have been put in place for years, but use the medium that they are comfortable with and can comment on and talk back to.

    Thoughts?

Leave a Reply